Why these Franklin Templeton funds got downgraded

May 29, 2017
 

Our analyst recently downgraded Franklin India Flexi Cap and Franklin India Taxshield.

The prime reason being the change at the helm. In May 2016, Lakshmikanth Reddy took over as the lead fund manager for both, while Janakiraman was named co-manager.

Reddy came on board Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund last year. He has yet to establish his credentials as a portfolio manager on mutual fund products over the long term. Hence the downgrade.

Having said that, we believed that the funds still deserved a positive rating. We find Reddy’s views to be consistent with the fund house’s views on the funds in terms of the respective investment strategy and the way it is managed. He also has strong support from an experienced and stable investment team. We draw confidence from the team-driven investment approach for which Franklin Templeton is known.

Consequently, though the funds get downgraded, they still merit a positive rating (Bronze) and not a Neutral or Negative.

To obtain a more detailed understanding about the funds, in terms of the type of stocks the fund manager invests in and the investment process he follows, download the detailed reports: Franklin India Taxshield and Franklin India Flexi Cap. 

FT

What the ratings indicate

The Morningstar Analyst Rating for Funds is a forward-looking analysis of a fund. The analyst looks at 5 key areas crucial to predicting the future success of a fund: People, Parent, Process, Performance, and Price.

Gold / Silver / Bronze: These are the top three ratings and are all positive. While all indicate that our analysts think highly of a fund, the difference between them corresponds to differences in the level of analyst conviction in a fund’s ability to outperform its benchmark and peers through time, within the context of the level of risk taken over the long term*.

Neutral: These are funds in which our analysts don’t have a strong positive or negative conviction over the long term*.

Negative: These funds possess at least one flaw that our analysts believe is likely to significantly hamper future performance over the long term*.

* Long term is defined as a full market cycle or at least 5 years.

Add a Comment
Please login or register to post a comment.
SV Prasad
Jun 8 2017 02:59 PM
I did see your transcript/video on Analyst rating methodology, but as not all the funds are rated by the same analyst, it would be more transparent if it could be more objective in most of the parameters you compare and evaluate with other schemes or managers or fund houses and list out commonly, with a subjective take added to it separately which could compliment or even differ with the rating arrived at
SV Prasad
Jun 8 2017 02:38 PM
Appreciate kind response by the Editor.

As per your analyst ratings, looks like you’ve left it the imagination of the reader to perceive a Bronze rating to be inferior to a Silver one, which in turn is inferior to a Gold rating in relative terms as one comes across in sporting events. To my mind, a legend note on Analyst rating methodology ( & even for star rating methodology ) and the adopted process would be more helpful & logical for an avid reader to judge and understand such ratings better, which should ideally be provided prominently on the website by default, being a globally acclaimed data analytics and rating agency. As you may perhaps be following in the back end, the usual method adopted to minimise subjectivity by such agencies is to segregate individual element scores based on a relative bunching in histogram plots. And the scores in turn are arrived at based on multiple quantitative / qualitative metrics for each attribute of interest and relevance, with weighted average inputs as per professional judgment in absence of any scientific basis.

In this article it is a bit surprising to note abrupt and steep downgrade of the referred funds without being backed by new qualitative/ quantitative data, rather than choosing to suspend rating temporarily or flagging them with a disclaimer clearly spelling out that they are kept on a watch list for some time in view of fund manager changes., which being a routine phenomena in the industry as often we may see less experienced faces or someone with demonstrated skills or experience but in a different area or type of funds. Such abrupt rating changes would skim off the importance attached by readers to your ratings and their methodology.
Larissa Fernand
Jun 8 2017 08:11 AM
Dear Prasad,
Comments are only taken out if they are abusive, vulgar, obscene or racially discriminatory. Other than that, all feedback stays on the website.
We did check the backend to see if any comment was registered but did not appear on the website. We did not find anything.
So we can only conclude that it was a technical glitch.
Thank you for the effort and time in responding to our analysis. We appreciate reader feedback.
Editor
SV Prasad
Jun 7 2017 12:34 PM
When you filter and donot post readers views be it good or bad, correct or incorrect as per your judgement, I dont think it makes any sense to spend time to post our views. Probably this is one of the reasons one hardly sees any reader responses posted on your web site. If readers are expected just to read what you have to say...well then it is fine then it is your website policy and no questions on that. I did post one a few days back against this article, unaware of your policy, and it wasnt published.
© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use    Privacy Policy
© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Please read our Terms of Use above. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
As of December 1st, 2023, the ESG-related information, methodologies, tools, ratings, data and opinions contained or reflected herein are not directed to or intended for use or distribution to India-based clients or users and their distribution to Indian resident individuals or entities is not permitted, and Morningstar/Sustainalytics accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this respect.
Company: Morningstar India Private Limited; Regd. Office: 9th floor, Platinum Technopark, Plot No. 17/18, Sector 30A, Vashi, Navi Mumbai – 400705, Maharashtra, India; CIN: U72300MH2004PTC245103; Telephone No.: +91-22-61217100; Fax No.: +91-22-61217200; Contact: Morningstar India Help Desk (e-mail: helpdesk.in@morningstar.com) in case of queries or grievances.
Top