BSE

A blue-blooded large-cap fund

May 25, 2016
 

ICICI Prudential Focused Bluechip was launched in the throes of the financial crisis of 2008. Not a great environment to launch an equity fund.

The then fund manager Prashant Kothari shouted from the rooftops on how different the fund was from current offerings in the market.

The fund would be an extremely concentrated offering with around 20 stocks from the large-cap space. A tight portfolio with low churn would be constructed from a limited universe of large-cap stocks. He would consider three dominant factors when buying a stocks: stable underlying business, low leverage, and confidence in the company’s management.

To his credit, Kothari delivered.

In the following three years (2009, 2010, 2011), the fund had an enviable track record.

Unlike other large-cap offerings, this fund does not dabble in mid and small caps, even to a tiny extent. While this makes it a pure large-cap offering, on the flip side, when smaller fare is on a roll, this fund may be unable to keep up with its peers due to avoidance of such stocks.

Neither does this fund shirk from concentrated bets. It’s current exposure of 37% to financial services is a case in point, way above the benchmark and category average exposure.

At one time, the top 10 stocks accounted for almost 60% of the portfolio. Worth noting is that as the size of his fund increased over time, the portfolio accommodated more stocks and began to support around 30-35 stocks.

This is a high conviction fund which has delivered over market cycles. In all the 7 calendar years of its existence, it underperformed the category average just once. It has managed to contain the downside and participate in the upside. According to the analysis done, over a three-year period, the fund captures almost 103% of the benchmark’s upside, slightly better than its peers. During a market downturn, the fund captures 80% of the benchmark’s downside, marginally lower as compared with its peers. It’s 5-year annualized return of 12% is ahead of the category average (9%).

So why does senior fund analyst Kavitha Krishnan give the fund a Bronze rating?

While you can read her views here, in a nutshell, she believes that the fund’s very core characteristic has undergone a change due to the ballooning asset size. While current fund manager Manish Gunwani has executed well, it is important to take note of the change in the concentration levels in the portfolio. Gunwani has had to increase the number of stocks in his portfolio, which can move anywhere from 50 to 60, with the top 10 accounting for around 44%. This is due to the fund’s size posing to be a challenge in the form of market-impact cost, the opportunity cost of having to spread out trades over longer periods, and liquidity management.

The Bronze rating indicates that the fund has notable advantages across several, but perhaps not all, of the five pillars—strengths that give the analysts a high level of conviction. The five pillars being Process / Performance / People / Parent / Price.

You can access details on the fund's portfolio and performance here.

Add a Comment
Please login or register to post a comment.
Prithwi Nath Keshari
Jun 27 2016 04:46 AM
I feel ICICI Pru Cussed Blue Chip as Bronze Rating undermines its long earned reputation to stay weather proof in varying climates of market. While we recommend this fund for good wealth creator at its stable stature Morning Star should clarify it placing to fund a Bronze.
Dhawal Parikh
May 27 2016 08:43 AM
I read the report and I am disappointed. I think it is vague and ends inconclusively. If the analyst says that "this fund is still evolving in terms of character", it means conviction is not there. So why bronze rating (which is positive as per last para in above article). In general, I feel Morning Star is no longer able to deliver sharp and clear research.
ramanathan dwarakanathan
May 26 2016 12:29 PM
had a detailed chat with Kavitha, understood the ranking rationale. ie change of strategy impacts the risk - return characteristics which is to be seen for a reasonably longer period of time. I buy her views. Thanks.
ramanathan dwarakanathan
May 25 2016 02:35 PM
I partially concur with Kavitha's view. With the fund size ballooning, it is not possible to maintain 20 stocks strategy for a longer period of time. Risk also increases significantly. But, what is not convincing is how does the growth pillars gets weakened with increase in the stocks? it's more do with the fund mgt process. The other 4 factors are more attributable at the fund level and not just scheme specific. In the light of all the above, your ranking does not appear justifiable.
© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use    Privacy Policy
© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Please read our Terms of Use above. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
As of December 1st, 2023, the ESG-related information, methodologies, tools, ratings, data and opinions contained or reflected herein are not directed to or intended for use or distribution to India-based clients or users and their distribution to Indian resident individuals or entities is not permitted, and Morningstar/Sustainalytics accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this respect.
Company: Morningstar India Private Limited; Regd. Office: 9th floor, Platinum Technopark, Plot No. 17/18, Sector 30A, Vashi, Navi Mumbai – 400705, Maharashtra, India; CIN: U72300MH2004PTC245103; Telephone No.: +91-22-61217100; Fax No.: +91-22-61217200; Contact: Morningstar India Help Desk (e-mail: helpdesk.in@morningstar.com) in case of queries or grievances.
Top