The trade war between the U.S. and China is hitting the latter at a vulnerable moment.
Last month, the Chinese National Bureau of Statistics reported that GDP grew by 6.2% in the second quarter, China’s slowest growth since 1992. Also, credit growth dropped amid weak demand and seasonal factors. Macquarie Securities was quoted in Bloomberg Quint saying that the key constraint has become credit demand, and in the coming months, credit growth would remain constrained by the lack of credit demand.
Earlier this year, Morningstar lowered its long-term (10-year average) China GDP growth forecast to 3.25% from 3.5% after incorporating the likelihood of scenarios of conflict between China and the U.S. In particular, the analysts were concerned about the onset of a new cold war between the U.S. and China, a new era of great power conflict falling short of all-out war but in which the U.S. seeks to use all available economic means to curb China’s continued rise, the most important of which is cutting off almost all its trade with China.
More recently, China allowed its currency to depreciate below the psychological threshold of 7 yuan to the dollar. Any further yuan depreciation would hit EU and Japan’s export sectors and hard, as both have higher trade exposure to China compared to the U.S.
PRESTON CALDWELL, equity analyst for Morningstar, shared his perspective on Morningstar.com and it has been reproduced below.
- The trade war could be the scapegoat for slower growth
China’s official real GDP growth fell to 6.2% in the second quarter from 6.4%. However, our alternative broad proxy actually increased to a 5.8% growth rate after hovering around 5.4%-5.6% in the prior three quarters.
The timing of a second-quarter growth rebound is logical--credit growth began increasing in January from trough levels, and economic growth typically follows credit with a one- to two-quarter lag. We think the official GDP figures have missed both the timing and the magnitude of China’s slowdown. We think that growth began slowing at the end of 2017 following a credit slowdown.
Quite plausibly, China deferred recognition of its economic slowdown until the end of 2018 in order to use the U.S.-China trade war as a scapegoat for slower growth.
- Following a precipitous drop in the first quarter, China’s exports to the U.S. stabilized in the second quarter
Net exports to the U.S. were actually up slightly year over year, as an 8% drop in exports was more than offset by a 28% drop in imports. Nevertheless, the pattern of recent months suggests a deferred impact from incremental tariffs, which weren’t hiked until May. The average incremental U.S. tariff rate on China has now reached 12.5% and will increase to 17.5% in the fourth quarter pending implementation of the recently ordered 10% tariffs on all of the remaining untargeted U.S. imports from China.
Overall, China’s goods trade balance has remained stable in recent quarters. However, declining net imports from Asian trading partners probably reflects temporary improvement as China curtails imports of intermediate inputs in preparation for a decline in U.S. exports. So far, China has not had to sell off meaningful amounts of its foreign currency reserves. This is in part because capital outflows have been modest, but also because China has been more flexible in allowing its currency to depreciate: In early August, the yuan/dollar exchange rate crossed 7 for the first time since 2008.
- Fixed-asset investment will continue to support China’s economic growth
China’s nominal fixed-asset investment slowed to 5.5% in the second quarter from the first quarter’s 6.3%. Our raw-materials-based monthly gauge of real fixed-asset investment also slowed slightly, with growth of 8.1% in the second quarter versus 8.3% in the previous quarter. In our view, fixed-asset investment growth will remain stable in the near term. While the acceleration of local government bond issuance and easing restrictions on these bonds to fund infrastructure projects have supported a limited investment recovery since mid-2018, we do not expect a large-scale stimulus as China’s leverage remains high.
Manufacturing fixed-asset investment growth further decelerated to 2.2% in the second quarter from 4.6% in the first quarter as a result of domestic and external headwinds. The real estate sector continued to underpin fixed-asset investment growth, with investment growing 10.8% in the second quarter, albeit slower than the first quarter’s 11.4%. Growth from this sector may slow soon, with developers facing restrictions in accessing the bond market. Alternative measures of real estate investment (starts and floor space under construction) also show decelerating growth, with starts by developers (commodity building) slowing to 9% in the second quarter from 12% in the first. It is not surprising that state sector spending grew faster at 7.0% in the second quarter versus 4.7% for the private sector due to the government’s stimulus policy, while the private sector is affected by trade concerns and lack of access to capital markets.
- Consumption growth still weak in Q2, though durable goods demand ticked up
Official retail sales growth jumped to 9.8% in June from 8.7% in March. However, the uptick was mainly driven by a higher inflation rate, to 3.1% from 1.8%, due to soaring food prices (pork, vegetables, and fruits), while real retail sales growth contracted slightly to 6.7% from 6.9%. Climate-change-induced extreme weather and African swine fever were the main reasons behind the hike in food prices. We expect more pork price inflation, but its impact will be limited, as we estimate that the pork share of the consumer price index basket is only about 2%. National Bureau of Statistics household survey data also painted a picture of weaker consumption growth, with expenditure growth, excluding residence, falling to 6.8% from 7.1% in the first quarter.
The food, clothing, and household goods component of the household survey consumption data indicated an improvement in goods demand, growing at 6.4% versus 3.6% in the first quarter. However, the growth of services categories slowed: Education, entertainment, and other fell to 4% from 18% in the first quarter. Healthcare remained steady at about 10%, but well below the 17% averaged in 2018. Our alternative measures of services demand also indicated a slowdown, although these capture a limited representation of the services sector.
Despite weak volume growth--staples are around low single digits for most of the companies we cover--the story was unchanged for the first half and probably will be for the rest of 2019: Corporates’ sales growth will outpace volume growth, buoyed by higher average selling prices from mix shifting toward premium products. In the meantime, we expect improving profitability for most of the companies, as the 3% value-added tax rate cut that applies to the manufacturing sector came into force in April.
- Total social financing growth flat in Q2 after rebound in Q1
Over the second quarter, the People’s Bank of China continued to inject liquidity and roll out policies to encourage financing to small and midsize enterprises, with a visible impact on interbank rates. However, the impact of credit has been underwhelming: Our adjusted total social financing measure remained flat with the previous quarter at 11.4% year-over-year growth, despite the prior quarter’s bounceback from trough growth of 10.3% in December. Flat credit growth fell in line with our prediction that credit growth would remain at 11%-12% in 2019--providing a sufficient boost to stabilize the economy but not create a full recovery (as occurred in the 2013 and 2016 easing cycles).
Corporate debt/GDP looks to increase to around 171% in 2019, and we also forecast increases in household debt to 55%. As a result, we estimate overall credit/GDP will approach 266% at the end of 2019, so China is not yet deleveraging.
The interbank rate fell to a post crisis low as the PBOC injected liquidity to support lending to smaller banks after the state takeover of Baoshang Bank in May. The takeover reduces any liquidity shocks to the market, while the one-year creditor backstop signals that regulators will limit their support. The fall in short-term interbank rates has failed to pass through to end borrowers. Both declines in bank wealth management product yields and average bank loan rates have lagged the interbank market rate decline by about six months and at much smaller magnitudes. This presses the need for replacing the loan benchmark rate by introducing the loan prime rate, as a part of regulators’ efforts to fix the long-blamed two-track system of lending rates in China.
